Liberian vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,011,319 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,961,015 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.92%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Liberian	Immigrants from Uganda
Minimum	16.9%	3.2%
Maximum	43.8%	47.7%
Range	27.0%	44.5%
Mean	28.9%	27.2%
Median	28.7%	28.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.0%	22.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.2%	30.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.1%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.2%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.2%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Liberians and Immigrants from Uganda by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Colombian (28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Choctaw (28.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Palestinian (28.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Colombians	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 28.3%
Liberians	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%