Moroccan vs Scottish Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Moroccan
Scottish
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Moroccans
Scottish
26.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Scottish Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,690,181 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,154,348 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 27.0%, a difference of 0.38%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Scottish |
| Minimum | 12.4% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 51.6% | 505.5% |
| Range | 39.1% | 500.4% |
| Mean | 28.5% | 42.0% |
| Median | 26.9% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.9% | 24.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 47.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 22.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 51.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 51.6% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Scottish by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Netherlands (26.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (26.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Cape Verdean (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Navajo (26.9%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Czechoslovakian (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Tsimshian (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Canadian (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Bulgarian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 3.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Moroccans | 3.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 3.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Navajo | 3.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | England | 3.2 /100 | #242 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 26.9% |