Polish vs Osage Family Households
COMPARE
Polish
Osage
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Poles
Osage
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Osage Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,976,877 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%, a difference of 0.38%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Osage |
| Minimum | 30.3% | 49.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 77.6% |
| Range | 69.7% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 68.0% | 64.8% |
| Median | 65.4% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 61.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.9% | 68.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Osage by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |