Sioux vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Sioux
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Sioux
Chickasaw
41.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,188,920 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.710 and weighted average of 41.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 11.1%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 84.8% | 68.4% |
| Range | 82.5% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 37.5% | 48.9% |
| Median | 39.4% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.8% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.5% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.7% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Zaire (42.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guyana (41.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Yemen (42.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |