Subsaharan African vs Lumbee Family Households
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Lumbee
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Lumbee
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Lumbee Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,265,071 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 63.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 32.6% | 27.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 67.4% | 72.1% |
| Mean | 62.5% | 62.4% |
| Median | 61.7% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.0% | 59.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.6% | 67.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are West Indian (63.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (63.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (63.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Croatia (63.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Turkey (63.1%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Israelis | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.4 /100 | #268 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #269 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |