Swiss vs Chinese Currently Married
COMPARE
Swiss
Chinese
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Swiss
Chinese
49.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
49.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Chinese Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,962,808 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 49.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,439 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 49.5%, a difference of 0.45%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Chinese |
Minimum | 34.3% | 33.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 64.9% |
Range | 65.7% | 31.1% |
Mean | 60.1% | 50.7% |
Median | 58.2% | 50.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.3% | 47.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.1% | 54.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Chinese by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are English (49.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Filipino (49.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Dutch (49.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Czech (49.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and German (49.6%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Scandinavian (49.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Pennsylvania German (49.6%, a difference of 0.14%), German (49.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch (49.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Scotland (49.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 50.7% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 50.5% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 50.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 50.0% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.0% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 49.7% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Germans | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.0% |