Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,703,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,840,510 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.83%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tohono O'odham	Immigrants from Thailand
Minimum	8.1%	8.9%
Maximum	69.3%	66.6%
Range	61.2%	57.7%
Mean	33.2%	28.1%
Median	30.8%	28.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	27.2%	24.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	38.3%	31.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.1%	7.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.1%	9.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.9%	9.3%

Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Thailand by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Choctaw (28.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%