Ugandan vs Romanian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Ugandan
Romanian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Ugandans
Romanians
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Romanian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,993,745 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,533,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.51%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Romanian |
| Minimum | 16.6% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 76.1% |
| Range | 31.1% | 72.4% |
| Mean | 28.4% | 29.3% |
| Median | 27.1% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 31.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Romanians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (27.5%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
| British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
| Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |