Ute vs Osage Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ute
Osage
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Ute
Osage
33.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
14.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
37.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Osage Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,718,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,866,368 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 32.1%, a difference of 2.9%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Osage |
Minimum | 12.5% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.5% | 96.0% |
Mean | 57.2% | 41.9% |
Median | 47.5% | 33.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.4% | 25.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 48.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 70.6% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.9% | 26.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.7% | 25.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Osage by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Czechoslovakian (32.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (32.0%, a difference of 0.11%), German (32.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Tlingit-Haida (32.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Germans | 39.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 32.0% |
Welsh | 38.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 32.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |