Immigrants from Jordan Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Select to Compare
Currently Married
Immigrants from Jordan Currently Married
47.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,237,852 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275 and weighted average of 47.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.99% in percentage of population currently married.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population currently married does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Jordan influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population currently married within an area, or if Immigrants from Jordan simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population currently married due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are New Zealander (47.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Okinawan (47.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Sri Lankan (47.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Laotian (47.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Australians | 90.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Syrians | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 88.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Osage | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 87.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
| New Zealanders | 84.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Portuguese | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Sri Lankans | 83.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 82.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants from Jordan Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan Data | Currently Married Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 29.6% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 61.2% |
| Range | 7.7% | 31.6% |
| Mean | 1.8% | 49.1% |
| Median | 1.3% | 49.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.67% | 46.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 52.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 5.6% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Jordan Percentile | Sample Size | Currently Married |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 83,069,791 | 43.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.057% | 44,510,240 | 44.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.094% | 18,173,093 | 47.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,970,782 | 47.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 6,007,812 | 48.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 3,675,120 | 49.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,755,180 | 47.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 2,191,677 | 49.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 1,221,782 | 50.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,138,839 | 49.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 805,480 | 47.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,247,677 | 43.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 337,325 | 45.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 469,065 | 48.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 422,672 | 51.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 423,170 | 46.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 360,990 | 48.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 277,337 | 50.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 160,740 | 50.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 282,201 | 51.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 167,823 | 43.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 48,630 | 48.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 110,348 | 48.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 176,938 | 51.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,562 | 52.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 7,782 | 53.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 74,840 | 53.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 14,982 | 50.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 138,607 | 51.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 82,468 | 46.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 52,627 | 53.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 92,277 | 53.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 83,024 | 49.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 64,439 | 48.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 44,281 | 42.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 37,601 | 52.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 54,590 | 50.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 28,464 | 49.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 14,894 | 43.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 8,220 | 55.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 36,930 | 44.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,525 | 44.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 16,613 | 53.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 51,537 | 57.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 1,221 | 45.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 21,760 | 46.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 6,496 | 55.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 14,915 | 54.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 6,549 | 61.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 2,160 | 44.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 8,171 | 59.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 7,763 | 57.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 13,291 | 47.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 15,452 | 51.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.80% | 9,960 | 59.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 29,883 | 44.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 57.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 53.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 889 | 36.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 54.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 28,568 | 46.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 8,919 | 50.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,453 | 53.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 11,084 | 49.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 11,259 | 49.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 371 | 38.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 51.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 45.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 562 | 32.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 182 | 29.6% |