Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,555,811 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of $82,193. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,365,624 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of $117,750, a difference of 43.3%.

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Apache ($82,184, a difference of 0.010%), Yuman ($82,139, a difference of 0.070%), Choctaw ($82,287, a difference of 0.11%), Colville ($82,474, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Caribbean ($82,513, a difference of 0.39%).

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Bolivia ($117,731, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish ($117,814, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Europe ($117,930, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sweden ($118,318, a difference of 0.48%), and Asian ($118,426, a difference of 0.57%).