Chickasaw vs Uruguayan Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,707,932 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of $59,090, a difference of 10.0%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Salvadoran ($59,141, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak ($59,039, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South America ($59,151, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian ($58,992, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Nigeria ($58,942, a difference of 0.25%).