Chinese vs Immigrants from Pakistan Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,779,032 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and household income with householder between the ages 25 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of $104,264. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,570,722 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and household income with householder between the ages 25 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020 and weighted average of $106,129, a difference of 1.8%.

Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Immigrants from Pakistan
Minimum	$46,250	$34,000
Maximum	$173,338	$187,880
Range	$127,088	$153,880
Mean	$102,110	$107,614
Median	$102,775	$107,714
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$90,138	$93,459
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$111,997	$118,512
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$21,859	$25,052
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$25,334	$27,793
Standard Deviation (Population)	$25,115	$27,582

Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Pakistan by Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years

In terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Italian ($104,215, a difference of 0.050%), Afghan ($104,410, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia ($104,503, a difference of 0.23%), Mongolian ($104,578, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Fiji ($103,954, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Austria ($106,103, a difference of 0.030%), Greek ($106,457, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Africa ($105,748, a difference of 0.36%), Paraguayan ($106,615, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Latvia ($105,522, a difference of 0.58%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years
Paraguayans	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional $106,615
Greeks	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional $106,457
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.8 /100 \| #56	Exceptional $106,129
Immigrants \| Austria	99.8 /100 \| #57	Exceptional $106,103
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional $105,748
Immigrants \| Latvia	99.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional $105,522
Egyptians	99.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional $105,282
Lithuanians	99.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional $105,223
Immigrants \| Italy	99.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional $105,201
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional $105,089
New Zealanders	99.7 /100 \| #64	Exceptional $105,085
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #65	Exceptional $105,082
Laotians	99.7 /100 \| #66	Exceptional $104,993
Immigrants \| Romania	99.6 /100 \| #67	Exceptional $104,713
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #68	Exceptional $104,662
Mongolians	99.6 /100 \| #69	Exceptional $104,578
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.6 /100 \| #70	Exceptional $104,503
Afghans	99.6 /100 \| #71	Exceptional $104,410
Chinese	99.5 /100 \| #72	Exceptional $104,264
Italians	99.5 /100 \| #73	Exceptional $104,215
Immigrants \| Fiji	99.5 /100 \| #74	Exceptional $103,954