Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
26.3%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
22.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.3%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,939,281 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,792,332 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 25.3%, a difference of 3.8%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 68.0% | 62.1% |
| Range | 64.9% | 58.1% |
| Mean | 27.5% | 28.5% |
| Median | 26.6% | 27.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.4% | 32.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Wage/Income Gap
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Chilean (26.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (26.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (26.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (26.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Zimbabwean (26.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 29.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 26.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 26.6 /100 | #189 | Fair 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 24.8 /100 | #190 | Fair 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 24.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 22.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 22.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 26.3% |
| Chileans | 22.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 22.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 26.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 21.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 26.3% |
| Venezuelans | 21.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 26.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 26.3% |
| Delaware | 20.9 /100 | #200 | Fair 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 19.3 /100 | #201 | Poor 26.4% |
| Laotians | 19.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 26.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Puget Sound Salish (25.3%, a difference of 0.060%), French American Indian (25.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (25.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Albanian (25.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Taiwanese | 81.6 /100 | #151 | Excellent 25.1% |
| Uruguayans | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 25.2% |
| Blackfeet | 78.1 /100 | #153 | Good 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 78.1 /100 | #154 | Good 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 77.7 /100 | #155 | Good 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 76.4 /100 | #156 | Good 25.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 75.8 /100 | #157 | Good 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 73.7 /100 | #158 | Good 25.3% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 73.0 /100 | #159 | Good 25.3% |
| French American Indians | 72.5 /100 | #160 | Good 25.4% |
| Albanians | 69.4 /100 | #161 | Good 25.4% |
| Shoshone | 69.0 /100 | #162 | Good 25.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 69.0 /100 | #163 | Good 25.4% |
| Koreans | 68.6 /100 | #164 | Good 25.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 25.5% |