Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Ugandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Ugandans
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,069 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 67.4%, a difference of 4.0%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
Minimum | 23.6% | 42.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 91.4% |
Range | 76.4% | 48.5% |
Mean | 61.3% | 66.9% |
Median | 64.5% | 66.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 51.8% | 64.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.6% | 69.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.8% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Africa (67.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (67.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Cambodian (67.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Zimbabwean (67.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uganda (67.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Ugandans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Ghanaians | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.1% |