Arab vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Arab
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Arabs
Chickasaw
84.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,557,270 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229 and weighted average of 84.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,700,460 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arab | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 31.7% | 37.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.3% | 62.8% |
Mean | 81.0% | 79.6% |
Median | 84.1% | 79.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 74.3% | 74.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.4% | 88.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Demographics Similar to Arabs by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Jordanian (84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Nigerian (84.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Scotch-Irish (84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and Korean (84.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Lebanese | 11.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 10.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 84.3% |
Israelis | 9.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 84.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 9.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 84.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 84.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 8.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 84.3% |
Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 84.3% |
Arabs | 6.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 84.2% |
Jordanians | 6.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 84.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 6.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 84.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 6.0 /100 | #224 | Tragic 84.2% |
Koreans | 5.9 /100 | #225 | Tragic 84.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 84.2% |
French American Indians | 5.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 84.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 84.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Comanche (81.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 82.3% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |