Carpatho Rusyn vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Latvian
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Latvians
85.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,868,211 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,671,100 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 85.4%, a difference of 0.22%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Latvian |
Minimum | 72.7% | 55.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.3% | 44.6% |
Mean | 87.5% | 87.3% |
Median | 86.0% | 86.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 84.6% | 84.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 89.0% | 95.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Latvians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Slovene (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ireland (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Serbia (85.5%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Paraguayan (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (85.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (85.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 85.5% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 85.5% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Bermudans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.3% |