Croatian vs Immigrants from Australia In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,744,392 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 80.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,207,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 80.0%, a difference of 0.090%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Croatian	Immigrants from Australia
Minimum	49.3%	42.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	50.7%	57.2%
Mean	76.8%	79.1%
Median	79.4%	79.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	75.0%	74.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	81.1%	82.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.5%	9.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.5%	9.3%

Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from Australia by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Jordanian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Egypt (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latvia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (80.1%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Filipino (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (80.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Russian (80.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Venezuelan (80.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Immigrants \| Latvia	97.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 80.1%
Jordanians	97.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Egypt	97.1 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 80.1%
Croatians	97.1 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 80.1%
Chileans	97.0 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	96.8 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 80.1%
Poles	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 80.1%
Uruguayans	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 80.1%
Ghanaians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Belarus	96.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	96.0 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 80.1%
Yugoslavians	95.9 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 80.1%
South Americans	95.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 80.1%
Filipinos	95.6 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 80.1%
Palestinians	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 80.0%
Russians	95.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 80.0%
Venezuelans	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 80.0%