Crow vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Crow
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Crow
Pima
76.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,203,042 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263 and weighted average of 76.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 74.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Pima |
| Minimum | 44.8% | 9.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 55.2% | 90.7% |
| Mean | 73.7% | 73.8% |
| Median | 77.5% | 78.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.2% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.2% | 83.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 18.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 22.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 22.3% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Hopi (77.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Lumbee (77.0%, a difference of 0.69%), Yup'ik (77.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and Pueblo (77.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.96%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Hopi (77.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |