Crow vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Crow
Slavic
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Crow
Slavs
38.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
40.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,169,003 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.549 and weighted average of 38.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,628,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 40.4%, a difference of 4.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Slavic |
Minimum | 14.3% | 14.6% |
Maximum | 69.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.6% | 85.4% |
Mean | 38.0% | 54.1% |
Median | 36.8% | 45.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.4% | 41.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.9% | 74.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 32.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 24.3% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Demographics Similar to Crow by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from Scotland (38.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (38.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Subsaharan African (38.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (40.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Aleut (40.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (40.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Fijian (40.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and American (40.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 40.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 40.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 40.5% |
British | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 40.5% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Slavs | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Americans | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 40.3% |
Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Northern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 100.0 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 40.1% |