Czech vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka In Labor Force | Age 30-34

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,299,393 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 85.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,680,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 85.6%, a difference of 0.14%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Czech	Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Minimum	72.8%	67.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	27.2%	32.3%
Mean	89.8%	86.1%
Median	88.7%	85.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	85.6%	83.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	95.4%	89.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.8%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.3%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	6.9%

Demographics Similar to Czechs and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Russian (85.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and Filipino (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 85.7%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 85.7%
Zimbabweans	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 85.6%
Croatians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 85.6%
Lithuanians	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.8 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 85.6%
Cape Verdeans	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 85.6%
Filipinos	99.6 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.6 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.6 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 85.5%
Czechs	99.6 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 85.5%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 85.5%
Poles	99.6 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Poland	99.5 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| France	99.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 85.5%