Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Estonian In Labor Force | Age 45-54

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,805,510 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 83.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,497,909 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Estonians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050 and weighted average of 83.4%, a difference of 0.050%.

In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Estonian
Minimum	67.6%	59.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	32.4%	40.6%
Mean	85.4%	84.0%
Median	84.2%	84.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	82.0%	80.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	87.7%	89.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.6%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.5%	8.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.4%	8.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Estonians by In Labor Force | Age 45-54

In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Greek (83.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (83.3%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Immigrants from Somalia (83.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Russian (83.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Cuban (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Serbian (83.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 45-54
Taiwanese	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Latvia	97.4 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 83.4%
Colombians	97.3 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 83.4%
Serbians	97.2 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	97.1 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Somalia	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 83.4%
Estonians	96.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 83.4%
Russians	96.8 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 83.4%
Cubans	96.7 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Egypt	96.6 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 83.4%
Belgians	96.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Croatia	96.5 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 83.4%
Jordanians	96.4 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	96.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	96.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	96.0 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 83.3%
Greeks	95.9 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 83.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	95.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 83.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	95.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 83.3%
Immigrants \| Asia	95.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 83.3%
Indians (Asian)	95.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 83.3%