Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,373,057 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,520,725 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.717 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.050%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Indian (Asian)	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	46.3%	9.1%
Maximum	82.9%	86.8%
Range	36.6%	77.7%
Mean	64.1%	59.8%
Median	64.5%	63.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	61.3%	54.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.6%	66.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.2%	15.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.1%	15.2%

Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Oceania by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%
Bhutanese	86.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	85.7 /100 \| #149	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	81.9 /100 \| #150	Excellent 65.4%
Czechs	81.5 /100 \| #151	Excellent 65.4%
Yugoslavians	81.3 /100 \| #152	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| China	80.5 /100 \| #153	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	78.3 /100 \| #154	Good 65.4%