Lumbee vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Lumbee
Creek
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Lumbee
Creek
78.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,283,478 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 78.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,727 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178 and weighted average of 80.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Creek |
Minimum | 11.8% | 30.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.2% | 70.0% |
Mean | 75.2% | 77.0% |
Median | 78.7% | 78.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.3% | 73.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.5% | 83.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.7% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Creek by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Paiute (78.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Crow (78.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Tohono O'odham (77.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Pueblo (77.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Ute (80.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cheyenne (80.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 78.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 78.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 78.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.6% |