Paiute vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Paiute
Houma
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Paiute
Houma
80.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paiute vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,391,639 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 80.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,405 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 79.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paiute | Houma |
Minimum | 45.1% | 52.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 97.6% |
Range | 54.9% | 45.6% |
Mean | 78.7% | 78.8% |
Median | 82.4% | 80.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.0% | 72.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.5% | 83.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Paiute and Houma by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Paiute are Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Dutch West Indian (80.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Seminole (80.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |