Pima vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Pima
Lithuanian
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Pima
Lithuanians
74.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 74.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,725,431 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 85.2%, a difference of 13.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 9.3% | 43.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.7% | 56.8% |
| Mean | 73.8% | 85.4% |
| Median | 78.3% | 86.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.4% | 81.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.7% | 93.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.7% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.96%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Polish (85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Cypriot (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Kenyans | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| German Russians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Thais | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.1% |