Portuguese vs Cherokee In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Portuguese
Cherokee
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Portuguese
Cherokee
40.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
40.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Cherokee In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,088,849 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 40.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,065,053 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191 and weighted average of 40.2%, a difference of 0.56%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Cherokee |
Minimum | 14.2% | 14.7% |
Maximum | 94.4% | 82.7% |
Range | 80.2% | 68.0% |
Mean | 46.5% | 39.1% |
Median | 43.6% | 40.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.0% | 32.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.6% | 44.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Cherokee by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Potawatomi (40.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Italian (40.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (39.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (39.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Canadian (40.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Northern European (40.2%, a difference of 0.060%), American (40.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Micronesia (40.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (40.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (40.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Slavs | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Americans | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 40.3% |
Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Northern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 100.0 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Potawatomi | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 40.0% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 40.0% |
Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 39.9% |
Iroquois | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 39.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 39.9% |
Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 39.8% |
French American Indians | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 39.8% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 39.7% |