Sri Lankan vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Iroquois
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Sri Lankans
Iroquois
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,177,214 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,240,076 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Iroquois |
Minimum | 61.0% | 18.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.0% | 81.7% |
Mean | 85.0% | 78.4% |
Median | 85.0% | 82.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 83.2% | 70.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.6% | 91.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 18.6% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |
Uruguayans | 78.5 /100 | #144 | Good 84.9% |
Palestinians | 77.7 /100 | #145 | Good 84.9% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% |