Tlingit-Haida vs Hmong In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Hmong
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Hmong
82.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Hmong In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,864,119 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.473 and weighted average of 82.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 82.4%, a difference of 0.13%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Hmong |
Minimum | 47.1% | 66.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.9% | 33.3% |
Mean | 79.8% | 83.7% |
Median | 78.3% | 82.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.1% | 79.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.0% | 87.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Hmong by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Micronesia (82.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (82.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (82.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American Indian (82.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (82.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Hispanic or Latino (82.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (82.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Micronesia (82.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Central America (82.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Aleut (82.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 82.8% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.7% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.6% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.6% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 82.5% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 82.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 82.4% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 82.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 82.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |