Yup'ik vs Arapaho In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Arapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Arapaho
62.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Arapaho In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,964,003 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,780,325 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 0.88%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 32.3% | 27.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 66.4% |
| Range | 67.7% | 38.8% |
| Mean | 63.0% | 54.7% |
| Median | 63.6% | 58.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.5% | 50.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 60.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Arapaho by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Potawatomi (62.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Seminole (62.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |