Zimbabwean vs Norwegian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Norwegian
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Norwegians
85.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Norwegian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,193,973 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,518,250 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471 and weighted average of 85.7%, a difference of 0.11%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Norwegian |
Minimum | 50.0% | 68.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.0% | 31.4% |
Mean | 86.8% | 89.6% |
Median | 86.1% | 88.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 84.2% | 85.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.6% | 94.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Norwegians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Serbian (85.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (85.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Ugandan (85.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |