Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 20-64
78.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,666,072 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535 and weighted average of 78.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.9% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Bahamas and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Bahamas influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Immigrants from Bahamas simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Mexican American Indian (78.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Puget Sound Salish (78.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (78.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (78.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and French American Indian (78.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 78.3% |
Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 78.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 78.3% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 78.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 78.2% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 78.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 78.2% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 78.2% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 78.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 78.2% |
Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 78.1% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 78.1% |
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 78.1% |
Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 78.1% |
Immigrants from Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 78.1% |
Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 41.7% |
Maximum | 8.8% | 94.5% |
Range | 8.8% | 52.8% |
Mean | 1.8% | 74.7% |
Median | 1.0% | 78.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.46% | 72.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 80.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 10.6% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Bahamas Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 70,189,094 | 79.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.049% | 14,056,891 | 79.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.085% | 6,104,124 | 79.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 3,294,008 | 78.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 2,364,129 | 80.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 1,398,969 | 78.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 1,220,222 | 78.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 1,257,192 | 80.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 866,851 | 78.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 496,653 | 78.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 705,551 | 81.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 323,463 | 76.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 110,873 | 75.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 393,862 | 81.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 137,512 | 76.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 197,536 | 78.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 100,325 | 80.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 125,375 | 76.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 170,223 | 78.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 17,476 | 82.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 92,307 | 77.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 137,600 | 80.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 65,202 | 84.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 116,586 | 79.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 50,595 | 74.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 43,529 | 81.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 64,287 | 77.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 104,824 | 82.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 159,944 | 77.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 33,966 | 73.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 2,381 | 68.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 47,470 | 79.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 12,080 | 85.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 5,174 | 69.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 45,312 | 78.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 1,011 | 46.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 10,208 | 67.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 14,558 | 82.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 43,099 | 74.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 8,244 | 73.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,791 | 94.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 2,349 | 71.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 847 | 51.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 7,385 | 81.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 9,677 | 82.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.86% | 18,487 | 41.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 1,714 | 53.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 8,118 | 81.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 15,735 | 60.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 2,190 | 71.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 2,151 | 72.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 1,540 | 87.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 305 | 63.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 2,426 | 57.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.84% | 1,651 | 46.0% |