Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.0095% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 46.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 53.6% |
| Mean | 33.9% | 79.8% |
| Median | 11.3% | 81.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.4% | 95.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 73.9% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.9% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.3% | 15.9% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,533,329 | 83.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 534,489 | 75.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,372 | 81.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 75.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | 85.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 85.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | 50.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 55.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | 84.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 79.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | 70.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 73.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 81.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 1,270 | 89.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 100.0% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.03% | 383 | 100.0% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 46.4% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 70.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 100.0% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 47.4% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 61.8% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 76.9% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 81.9% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 75.2% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 85.7% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 397 | 100.0% |