Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chickasaw
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 8.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 62.3% | 35.7% |
| Range | 61.2% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 16.2% |
| Median | 16.0% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.3% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Osage (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Alaska Native (13.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and Marshallese (13.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
| German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |