Aleut vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Aleut
Czech
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Aleuts
Czechs
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,373,672 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,396,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 24.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Czech |
Minimum | 4.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 36.6% |
Range | 95.8% | 35.5% |
Mean | 31.1% | 14.9% |
Median | 20.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.2% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Alaskan Athabascan (17.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Portugal | 11.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
German Russians | 10.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |