American vs Moroccan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
American
Moroccan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Americans
Moroccans
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Moroccan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,572,763 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,064,228 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 5.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Moroccan |
Minimum | 3.7% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.3% | 93.0% |
Mean | 34.4% | 26.4% |
Median | 26.6% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.6% | 35.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 22.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.9% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.9% | 21.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and Marshallese (18.7%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |