Armenian vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Iroquois
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Iroquois
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
12.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,319,420 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.060%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 13.1% | 22.9% |
| Range | 12.1% | 21.3% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 7.4% |
| Median | 4.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Iroquois by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
| Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
| Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
| Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
| Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
| Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |