Armenian vs Pakistani Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Pakistani
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Pakistanis
12.1%
POVERTY
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
POVERTY
82.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Pakistani Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,820,657 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,215,631 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 0.75% |
| Maximum | 19.8% | 43.1% |
| Range | 17.1% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 12.7% |
| Median | 11.4% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Pakistanis by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Basque (11.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |