Austrian vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Austrian
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Austrians
Cherokee
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,015,533 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 25.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Austrian | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 14.3% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 56.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 42.4% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 31.8% | 37.0% |
| Median | 30.1% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.9% | 42.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Austrians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |