Bahamian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bahamian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bahamians
Chinese
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,361,785 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 40.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 43.0% |
| Range | 56.3% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 26.7% | 16.1% |
| Median | 22.7% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.2% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |