Bangladeshi vs Cherokee Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Cherokee
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Cherokee
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Cherokee Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,334,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 54.2% |
| Range | 24.9% | 50.6% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 17.8% |
| Median | 12.6% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Cherokee by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Chickasaw (13.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |