Barbadian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Barbadian
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Barbadians
Chinese
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,162,616 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 54.5%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Barbadian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 52.9% | 53.8% |
Range | 51.8% | 52.0% |
Mean | 19.8% | 14.4% |
Median | 18.3% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 10.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Liberian (20.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Spanish American Indian (20.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Aleut (20.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (20.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 20.0% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 20.0% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 20.1% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 20.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 20.2% |
Aleuts | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 20.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 20.3% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 20.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 20.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |