Bolivian vs Immigrants from Scotland Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Immigrants from Scotland
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Immigrants from Scotland
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Immigrants from Scotland Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,589,682 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,352,980 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.390 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 29.9% | 17.4% |
| Range | 28.3% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Median | 7.5% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Immigrants from Scotland by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Italian (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |