Bolivian vs Indian (Asian) Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Indian (Asian)
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Indians (Asian)
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Indian (Asian) Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,550,226 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,562,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.20%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 42.1% | 20.6% |
| Range | 41.0% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 10.2% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Indians (Asian) by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |