Bolivian vs Turkish Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Bolivian
Turkish
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Bolivians
Turks
9.3%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Turkish Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,439,878 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 16.7% |
| Range | 24.3% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 7.6% |
| Median | 7.0% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Turks by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Czech (9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Bhutanese (9.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |