British West Indian vs Dutch West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Dutch West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Dutch West Indians
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Dutch West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,761,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 0.25%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Dutch West Indian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 34.4% | 43.3% |
Range | 32.6% | 33.7% |
Mean | 14.9% | 19.7% |
Median | 15.0% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 20.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Dutch West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |