Bulgarian vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Bolivian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Bolivians
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,945,490 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,239,714 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 3.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Bolivian |
Minimum | 0.87% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 48.7% |
Range | 45.8% | 47.7% |
Mean | 12.7% | 12.5% |
Median | 11.4% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Bolivians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |