Bulgarian vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Immigrants from China
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Immigrants from China
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,671,341 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,197,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 24.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.47% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 20.0% |
Range | 45.0% | 18.9% |
Mean | 4.4% | 5.8% |
Median | 3.5% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.88%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.92%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |