Burmese vs Bhutanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Bhutanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Bhutanese
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Bhutanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,380,335 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,917,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 3.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 49.5% |
| Range | 28.8% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Bhutanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |