Burmese vs Yugoslavian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Burmese
Yugoslavian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Burmese
Yugoslavians
10.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Yugoslavian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,767,896 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,144,378 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.77%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 43.5% | 30.4% |
Range | 41.8% | 27.3% |
Mean | 10.5% | 10.1% |
Median | 8.7% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Yugoslavians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Romanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Poland (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Romanians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Burmese | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.1% |